A Response to Friday’s Panel from Peter Bishop (TECH)Posted: March 31, 2012
[Editor’s note: Peter Bishop, of the College of Technology and its program of Future Studies, of which he is Coordinator, had this email exchange with Frank Holt. He later agreed to share these thoughts on the CTE blog. We thank him for his interesting comments during the session, and for giving permission to quote his email here.–DM]
Thanks for your session today. Since I came late and had to leave early, I’m assuming that were teaching the session!
Can you send me your slides? I just came into the last one, which is also a favorite theme of mine. For-profit universities almost always have central development and distributed delivery, almost all with para-professionals and part-time adjuncts who are usually working in the field full-time. It’s a much more efficient model. I know Phoenix could price their courses much lower as a result, but they price it just below state university rates in order to leave their healthy profit margins intact.
And yes, the rest of the system could move toward central development through the licensing arrangements you mentioned. I’ve offered to license our futures curriculum many times since it is unique and very few colleges could mount such a course on their own, but so far no takers. But maybe someday.
It occurred to me, however, that we do have a form of central development in the textbook market which is now expanding its effect on the course through CDs, DVD, test packs and now websites
And I found the discussion following your talk very interesting. One tendency we have in thinking about the effect of trends that are changing an institution (like higher ed) is to believe that the new will completely replace the old. That does happen, but much more often it reduces the old as it grows and gobbles up parts of the market, but rarely does the old go away completely. And I love your analogy of college as the grand tour. The undergrad experience will remain for many, but it will be expensive so smaller than it is today.
I found the rest of the discussion a study in dialectics. Attached are the many either-or problems/dilemmas/dichotomies that people were bringing up. I tend to be a both-and person myself. Most of the New stuff is definitely on the rise, but it doesn’t mean that all the Old stuff goes away. The task is to maintain balance and not let either, the New or the Old, take over completely.
So thanks again for holding this session. Should be a lot more of this type of discussion…
So what do others think? What would a “both/and” model of past, present, and future higher education look like?